Typos and mistakes on pages 177 and 183

Careful reader Ian Gow from Stanford caught the following two typos/mistakes:

Assumption CA1 on p. 177 should read just like assumption A1 on p. 155, except conditional on X_i (the subscript 0 on Y_0i is incorrect).

On p. 183, the para beginning “The size of the group of compliers i given by . . .” First, the statement that P(S_1i=>s=>S_0i) is non-negative by virtue of monotonicity is silly: of course this non-negative, since its a probability! Monotonicity is needed, however, for this to be equal to the difference in the CDFs of S0_i and S1_i (as the sentence following should read).

Thanks Ian!

Published Tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>